automotive design
Two of the Most Beautiful Cabriolet Speedsters
Two of the most beautiful cabriolet speedsters of recent times cost a king’s ransom and go like stink. Because most of us will only ever get to read about them, I thought I’d give them a plug here just so we’re all aware that there are still some very extraordinary cars being made. Arguably, and rightly so, these two cars may in your opinion not be quite as exceptional as a McLaren Elva, Chevrolet Corvette Convertible, a BMW Z4 convertible or even a Ferrari SF90 Spider, however if I had a Bentley Mulliner Bacalar or an Aston Martin V12 Speedster parked in my garage I would be especially pleased.
Only 12 of the Bentley Mulliner Bacalars will ever exist, so, as you can imagine, the price tag of one of these is eyewatering (2.8 million AUD). Eighty-eight Aston Martin V12 Speedsters aren’t that many either; they fetch close to 1.5 million dollars new. It is almost inevitable that these two cabriolet cars will sell for more on the second-hand car market just because they are so rare and desirable. However, if you happen to be reading this, and are a squillionaire, then here are two of the most attractive cars on the planet.
Born out of the Bentley Continental stable, under the hood of the Mulliner Bacalar lies a W12 engine that has been fettled to produce 485 kW of power. It sits hunkered down on wider tracks and mesmerizing new wheels, and it boasts carbon-fibre front and rear wings, new light clusters (which look really cool) and a super glitzy centre console. Inside the Bentley Bacalar is a world of luxury and fine materials, as you would expect. Exclusive patterns on the switchgear knurling, for example, are only ever found on the Bacalar models. Then there are the uniquely quilted seats, where each seat boasts as many as 144,199 stitches. The veneer inserts that are used in the wrap-around cabin are from old river-wood trees from East Anglia peat bogs and are 5,500 years old (don’t tell the greenies this!).
Aston, on the other hand, has created a sweeter front end that looks sharper than the more muscular Bentley. Seated down low in the cockpit, the Aston also has the more futuristic dash design, with the chrome-rimmed air vents on the vertical either side of the digital driver’s display. 3-D printed rubber is used throughout the cabin, and then the bar that runs between the seats is a superb feature that looks exciting as well as ensuring strength to the open-top speedster’s on-road rigidity.
Aston’s V12 Speedster uses a potent 5.2-liter twin-turbo V12 that produces 515 kW and 752 Nm of torque. This power is sent to the rear wheels via an eight-speed automatic gearbox and a mechanical limited-slip differential. A 0-100 km/h sprint can be completed in around 3.6 seconds and the top speed arrives at a limited 186 mph (298 km/h). It sounds stunning when the throttle opens out.
The stats are that the Bentley Bacalar can run through the 0-100 km/h sprint in less than 4 seconds, and the 6-litre W12 twin-turbo engine packs 900 Nm of breath-taking torque, capable of hurling you to speeds well in excess of 200 mph (320 Km/h). AWD ensures maximum grip for all occasions, of course.
Where is Motorsport Currently Found on the EV Map?
Traditionally, the latest cutting-edge technology finds its way into road cars via the heat of motor racing. We are seeing EV racing going big quickly with the relatively recent Formula E championship, but how many motor racing championships are looking to EV technology for their future racing blue-print? As yet, EV motor racing technology hasn’t made its way into the everyday life of most average Australian motorists. Most of us still drive a motor vehicle with a healthy internal combustion engine, and most of us won’t be intending or even considering buying an expensive EV as an everyday means of transport anytime soon.
Supercars are continuing to investigate implementing hybrid technology into its racing schedule.
Formula One has had its engine regulations tweaked further with the aim of promoting closer racing and more balanced competition, as well as bringing economic and sporting sustainability to Formula 1. So, the cars are now flashier and more visually alluring, with the reshaping of the front and rear wings looking good. Formula One has a target to be net zero by 2030, and the way this is to be achieved is by removing single use plastics from its events, in collaboration with its circuits. Formula One won’t be going electric but will stay hybrid, and this has been a definite decision that the ‘powers that be’ have taken for the good of the automotive industry as they keep their racing car platforms relevant for future road cars. Formula One does not see electrification as the new world-religion, and it has stated that EVs are definitely not the only way to move forward with cars. Hybrid technology is Formula One’s current future objective, where the 2025 engine-unit will be hybrid and using 100 % sustainable fuels. Formula One sees a need to reduce the costs of this new engine-unit and platform so that it is affordable and less complex, which will open up huge potential for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to use in other applications for road cars.
In the World Rally Championship, current hybrid engine regulations from 2022 through to 2025 is all go, which introduces hybrid technology to the fastest cars on gravel. The hybrid technical regulations are a long way from being finalised, but initial talks have mooted a ‘supplementary hybrid system’ which controls components and software. The proposed hybrid units would allow WRC cars, which will retain the 2017 aero and engine package, to run as full EVs on transit stages, while providing a power boost on competitive special stages. Following 2025, the plan is to open up the rules to allow manufacturers to use their own electric systems for racing.
Formula E
Formula E is going from strength to strength, with Mercedes-Benz and Porsche recently joining the grid. Formula E, officially the ABB FIA Formula E World Championship, is a single-seater motorsport championship for electric cars (EVs). The series was conceived in 2011 in Paris. Formula E is the biggest motor racing event solely focussed on EV racing alone, where it is the proving ground and platform to test new ev technologies, drive development to the production line, and put more EVs on the road.
Using the sport as its showcase, the ABB FIA Formula E World Championship is sending the biggest message out to the world that may help alter perceptions and speed-up the switch to electric, in a bid to counteract the so-called “climate crisis” as well as addressing the effects of air pollution – particularly in cities. Sure, Formula E is the fastest-growing series in motorsport because its also the newest; however, it is certainly going to help put EV technology out there on the roads, even if most current EV buyers are either famous and or high-end earners.
Some electrification in motor racing is happening, where we’re seeing classes like the British Touring Car Championship, IndyCar, IMSA, NASCAR and World Rallycross Championship having some sort of hybrid or fully electric rules etched into the near-future pipeline. This is all good, but the reality is that most motorists in the general public will still be driving a car with a combustion engine, or combustion engine with hybrid technology, or a car with a combustion engine running on bio fuels in a decade because of the price of a new EV being way too steep, the lack of an EV infrastructure another, the cost of developing a country’s power grid worthy of supporting the power drain of a big EV fleet, EV battery life span, and the list goes on…
All of the many negative attributes that can be accredited to EVs aside, there are some fascinating new technological developments in hybrid and ev technology unfolding within motorsport itself.
Leaving the Past Behind
Over the last decade an array of features has been evolving expeditiously in automotive circles. New cars that we drive today are vastly different to the cars that were driven 10 to 15 years ago. Technology has come on very quickly, and so too has the world that we live in. Today we have amazing things like online streaming, extensive EV models, the invention of the Android phone, accident avoidance, adaptive cruise control, infotainment everything, GPS tracking, Rover on Mars… The list is long. What big features are found in today’s new cars that weren’t part of the package in an equivalent new car bought back in the noughties?
Here are just some of the changes:
Parking Assist
With the introduction of cameras around the outside of the car (the most common, of course is front and back), backing into small spaces, parallel parking or even just checking your blind spot have all become much easier tasks to perform about town, at home and up the neighbour’s tricky driveway. Rear-view cameras have made a big impression to the level of satisfaction enjoyed by customers across all car models for some time; it has been a real winner. 360-degree cams, a bird’s eye view camera and integrated dash cams are also making their way on-board. Citroen C3’s Connected-CAM gives you a recording through the dash cam, which, should you be involved in a collision, may vastly help in making your insurance claim run smoothly.
Information and entertainment
Put these two words together and we get ‘Infotainment’, and this word originated from the infotainment systems that we now find as standard features of almost every new car on the market. Our huge desire to be connected with the internet and with others seems insatiable, and 10 to 15 years ago the luxury of a CD player and cruise control are now pretty standard items for new base level cars. The impressive growth in Social Media and instant messaging has created a huge vacuum for car designers to fill, so developing systems inside their cars to keep up with this growing trend to satisfy their customer’s hankering for media and phone connections is a must. The Auxiliary socket, the Bluetooth connectivity feature, built in hard drives and now the ability to stream our library of music through our entertainment screens have all become pretty common on a new current model of car. Voice activated controls, bluetooth connectivity, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are all recent features that have been designed to keep a vehicle’s driver and occupants constantly connected to people and information. I don’t think it’s such a great thing to have mobile phone connections inside a car, but then I like driving for driving sake, so who am I to pass judgement.
Crash Avoidance Systems
Since the 1st of November 2014, Europe took a major step forward in mandatory safety features. In addition to standard electronic stability control systems, all new cars sold in the EU had to be equipped with new safety features like the driver’s seatbelt reminders and ISOFIX child seat anchorage. As of March 2018, all car manufacturers were required to install eCall, an automatic emergency call system, which reduces the time it takes for an emergency response team to arrive at the scene of the accident. And, since 2014, auto manufacturers has picked up even more so on the importance of top safety credentials being a consumer’s expectation, and so massive developments in driver assistive technology started to find their way into new cars. Collision Warning Systems, Pedestrian Alert, Automatic Braking, Blind Spot Information and Cross Traffic Alerts were incorporated to avoid common causes of road traffic accidents. These are features I do applaud, though I wish there was a way to stop people being so fixated with their mobile phones when travelling in the first place!
Keyless entry, keyless Start and Stop systems, alarms and warning systems are all examples of ever-developing security systems that we find on the new cars today. And these days you will be struggling to find a vehicle without some sort of satellite navigation connection (a possible cause of many car accidents). Platforms like MirrorLink, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto all allow you to display your maps on your actual car display screen in the centre of the dash (as well as the digital driver’s display on flash cars like an Audi or Mercedes Benz) and the phone’s audio connectivity allows for verbal instruction via voice commands and control.
Have we moved on? Yes we have, but then the hard task master applying the pressure to always having to come up with something new in order to make more money is an evident presence in all of this. I wonder if a simple crash avoidance system for those nasty severe head-ons would be a simple barrier down the centre of most major highways and to stay off the phone…
When ADAS Features Fail
I don’t quite know why I’ve become more attentive to learning about a car’s ability to protect its occupants in the event of a collision, along with its ability to avoid the collision altogether in the first place. I expect it has a lot to do with having close family members who occasionally need to drive themselves places. Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) are growing in popularity. ADAS systems can help prevent accidents not only at speed, but also when parked as a stationary car. ADAS features are designed with one purpose in mind and that is to increase driver and occupant safety.
ADAS features include things like automatic emergency braking, blind spot detection, collision warning systems, cross-traffic alert, forward and rear collision warning, lane departure warning, lane keeping assist, park assist, pedestrian detection and avoidance systems, cyclist detection and avoidance systems, road sign recognition, active radar cruise control… and the list goes on. ADAS employs cameras and sensors to detect a potential collision or event and then proceed to activate systems of avoidance if necessary. These are important safety features which help prevent accidents.
Research on insurance claims that was carried out by LexisNexis Risk Solutions showed that vehicles involved in incidents that had ADAS on-board exhibited a 27% reduction in the frequency of claims made for bodily injury. The results also showed that vehicles that had ADAS on-board exhibited a 19% reduction in the frequency of claims made for property damage. Obviously, this would suggest that the systems must be doing some good.
A study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) revealed that the crash involvement rate for vehicles with blind-spot monitoring was 14% lower than for the same vehicle without the equipment. Researchers also stated that the study also suggested that if every vehicle sold in the US in 2015 was equipped with blind-spot monitoring, 50,000 crashes and 16,000 crash injuries might have been prevented.
At present, one of the big downsides of the ADAS features is that they are darn expensive. Not only do they put the price of a new car up, they also make the car costlier to insure because if any of the systems gets damaged the insurance and repair bills are usually eye-watering. Hopefully, ADAS features will come way down in price and become similar to standard computer software and technology which is, on the whole, a dime-a-dozen now.
The other thing is that I hope ADAS will function 100% of the time correctly as intended, because vehicles designed to be able to automatically brake for objects such as other cars, pedestrians, and cyclists, and to drive themselves inside highway lanes without driver input, is not an exact science. A slightly frightening example of my concern here is when Volvo was demonstrating its pedestrian AEB technology to journalists in 2016. Volvo used their V60 model in the demonstration, where it was travelling toward a dummy named Bob. The V60 didn’t detect Bob being in the way, and so Bob was hit in what was a controlled environment. An alert driver in the V60 may well have returned a better outcome.
Then shortly after, another Volvo V60 was demonstrating its collision detection and avoidance system where it was to avoid hitting a stationary truck. The failure to detect and avoid the collision can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNi17YLnZpg
Again, an alert and competent driver could well have resulted in a better outcome, should this have happened in the real world.
In 2018, the IIHS took five new vehicles and tested them. The Tesla Model 3, the Tesla Model S, the BMW 5 Series, the Mercedes E-Class and the Volvo S90 were the test vehicles. Each vehicle’s AEB, adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist systems were tested. Some of the problems IIHS encountered was that the AEB didn’t actually work in some vehicles in some circumstances.
In other tests, the IIHS observed: “The BMW 5-series steered toward or across the lane line regularly, requiring drivers to override the steering support to get it back on track. Sometimes the car disengaged steering assistance on its own. The car failed to stay in the lane on all 14 valid trials. The Model S was also errant in the hill tests.”
Sadly, just a couple of years ago an autonomous Uber fitted with even more sensors than any standard ADAS-equipped road car killed a pedestrian at night in the US. This happened while researchers and designers were conducting public testing. What this suggests is that the ADAS technology is amazing and good enough to be placed into new cars. However, it doesn’t mean ADAS will always work as intended, and it does point to the fact that drivers must still always be fully alert at the wheel. If the driver is not fully alert, the outcome from these system fails can sometimes be way worse than if the driver was fractionally slower to manually override the systems detection time and action times.
I’ve heard of numerous occasions when vehicles have falsely detected situations. A more common fail is when accident emergency braking (AEB) engaged on-board a car when it shouldn’t have, which meant that the AEB stopped the vehicle abruptly and unexpectedly on a clear road. At the time, traffic is still coming up behind the vehicle. Lane keep assist isn’t always that great either, and the results of a high-speed mishap on a main highway is tragic.
ANCAP is Australian’s big car-safety tester, and a recent representative suggested that AEB and lane-keeping assist technology, which is where the car will steer itself, was beginning to be put under the microscope. This would test for how accurate the system actually is, and if it would actually do the opposite and steer the vehicles into a dangerous situation. Testing ADAS features should take priority over just saying that the technology is available in the car at the time of crash testing, whereby the appropriate ADAS feature box is ticked and the job done.
ADAS mostly works for the better. It does raise obvious safety problems, particularly when manufacturers have all the pressure to pack in as many ADAS features into their vehicles as possible for as little cost as possible to remain competitive on the sales front. This pressure would suggest that these systems could be prone to potentially become unsafe.
With cars loaded with ADAS features, you could also say that drivers of these new vehicles might be tempted to hop on the mobile phone to check messages once they have activated the adaptive cruise control and lane-keep assist systems. Essentially, it becomes easier to break the law; which takes us back to the point that we shouldn’t rely heavily on ADAS technology because it can fail to work. We don’t often hear this preached at the car sales yard or on new-car adverts.
In Australia, features such as antilock brakes (ABS) and electronic stability control (ESC) are mandatory in new vehicles that are sold to the public. These mandatory requirements are set to be pushed to the next level, where automatic emergency braking (AEB), adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist would have to be on-board any new vehicle being sold to the public. Even alcohol detection devices may well be part of these standard requirements. Europe is set to introduce some of these requirements over the next few years, and Australia is likely to follow the lead. Newly imported European cars would end up with these features anyways, a win-win for us new-car buyers.
ADAS is good, but we still need to drive our cars.